Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations increased sulphur uptake by Indian mustard over no irrigation.

A claim from Effect of sulphur fertilizer on sulphur uptake and forage yield of Brassica juncea in condition of different regimes of irrigation · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations increased sulphur uptake by Indian mustard over no irrigation.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
two irrigationse3
Outcome
sulphur uptake by crope3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no irrigatione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To study the effect of irrigation and sulphur on Indian mustard, a field experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97
e3

“application of two irrigations being on par with one irrigation, significantly increased sulphur content in forage over no irrigation, which resulted in increased sulphur uptake by crop in both the years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1072

Title

Effect of sulphur fertilizer on sulphur uptake and forage yield of Brassica juncea in condition of different regimes of irrigation

Issa Piri; A R Ostad Rahimi; Abolfazl Tavassoli; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2012. doi:10.5897/ajar11.125

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-2ccbd458570e167d4bcc62cd2152a2b8adbe7454e1aa9ac13cd51fac9c14b3ff · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · nutrient: content · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.