Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Forage yield of Indian mustard increased significantly with successive increases in applied sulphur.

A claim from Effect of sulphur fertilizer on sulphur uptake and forage yield of Brassica juncea in condition of different regimes of irrigation · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage yield of Indian mustard increased significantly with successive increases in applied sulphur.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
applied sulphure7
Outcome
Forage yielde7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To study the effect of irrigation and sulphur on Indian mustard, a field experiment was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97
e7

“Forage yield of mustard increased significantly with the successive increase in the level of applied sulphur in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1596

Title

Effect of sulphur fertilizer on sulphur uptake and forage yield of Brassica juncea in condition of different regimes of irrigation

Issa Piri; A R Ostad Rahimi; Abolfazl Tavassoli; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2012. doi:10.5897/ajar11.125

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5930899bb0a4f16a20b549fe783fe6cdda432f9b1840c992d15b9fd10f9b0330 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.