Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly increased grain zinc content independently of variety, in a rate-dependent manner.

A claim from Effects on food-type soybean cultivars when biofortified with different rates of zinc · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc significantly increased grain zinc content independently of variety, in a rate-dependent manner.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
zinc rate appliede0
Outcome
zinc content in the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
independent of the studied varietye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–38
e0

“It also significantly increased zinc content in the grain and this increase was independent of the studied variety, but was a function of the zinc rate applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1024

Title

Effects on food-type soybean cultivars when biofortified with different rates of zinc

Natália Trajano de Oliveira; Pedro Milanez de Rezende; Adriano Teodoro Bruzi; et al. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 2018. doi:10.19084/rca17151

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-2cde434c7fa8d96238ffbb6f3407e819c2b08eeb768009531735dd89fabf4ae7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    AA 100 * Zn 6 was the most effective treatment for enhancing Zn biofortification in soybean grains.

    The effects of foliar amino acid and Zn applications on agronomic traits and Zn biofortification in soybean (Glycine max L.) · 2024

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Zinc impeded iron transport from roots to aboveground soybean parts.

    Effect of Zinc on Translocation of Iron in Soybean Plants · 1970

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Added Zn increased foliar Mn to phytotoxic levels only on Sassafras soil at pH 6.3.

    Zinc, Cadmium and Manganese Uptake by Soybean from Two Zinc‐ and Cadmium‐Amended Coastal Plain Soils · 1980

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zinc deficiency had little effect on P content of soybean plants.

    Phosphorus‐Zinc Interaction in Two Soybean Varieties Differing in Sensitivity to Phosphorus Nutrition · 1968

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. negative
    Soil Zn additions significantly increased root and foliar Mn contents to phytotoxic levels.

    Differential Cultivar Tolerance in Soybean to Phytotoxic Levels of Soil Zn. I. Range of Cultivar Response1 · 1979

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Zn phytoavailability to soybean was significantly elevated at 200 and 400 mg kg–1 Zn loadings in both soils.

    Copper and zinc aging in soils for a decade: changes in metal extractability and phytotoxicity · 2015

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    High soil Zn reduced shoot Fe concentration in soybean and rice to deficient levels.

    Heavy metal toxicity in rice and soybean plants cultivated in contaminated soil · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Extractable Mn in soil was unaffected by soil Zn additions at both pH levels.

    Differential Cultivar Tolerance in Soybean to Phytotoxic Levels of Soil Zn. II. Range of Zn Additions and the Uptake and Translocation of Zn, Mn, Fe, and P1 · 1979

    Opposite direction

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.