Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Differential Cultivar Tolerance in Soybean to Phytotoxic Levels of Soil Zn. I. Range of Cultivar Response1

M. C. White; A. M. Decker; R. L. Chaney

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Heavy metals in waste materials added to agricultural soils can severely inhibit subsequent crop growth. This study was conducted to evaluate the variation in tolerance among cultivars of an agriculturally important plant species to phytotoxic levels of added soil Zn. Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars were screened, through greenhouse pot studies, for their growth response to Zn at pH 5.5 and 6.5 on a Sassafras sandy loam (Fragiudult) amended with 1.31 (control), 131, and 262 ppm Zn. Significant differential responses were found, and the cultivars were grouped into several tolerance and uptake classes, based on the results of the pH 6.5, 262‐ppm Zn treatment: tolerant (9 to 18% leaf dry weight yield reduction [YR], 5 cultivars), normal (20 to 32% YR, 12 cultivars), sensitive (33 to 48% YR, 3 cultivars); accumulator (696 to 730 ppm trifoliolate leaf Zn, 5 cultivars), normal (549 to 675 ppm Zn, 11 cultivars), and excluder (389 to 540 ppm Zn, 4 cultivars). Soil Zn additions significantly increased root and foliar Mn contents to reported phytotoxic levels at both pH 5.5 and 6.5, but did not influence DTPA‐TEA extractable soil Mn. Significant cultivar differences in root and leaf Mn contents were observed. The results of this work illustrate the importance of cultivar selection, not only for field planting of Zn‐enriched soils, but also for its influence on experimental results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cultivars differed significantly in growth responses to Zn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
differential responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differential responses were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars were screened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five tolerant cultivars had 9 to 18% leaf dry weight yield reduction at pH 6.5 and 262 ppm Zn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
tolerante0
Treatment
262‐ppm Zne1
Outcome
leaf dry weight yield reductione0
Value
9 to 18%e0
Qualifier
pH 6.5e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tolerant (9 to 18% leaf dry weight yield reduction [YR], 5 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–761 · show in text ↑
e1

“pH 6.5, 262‐ppm Zn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–690 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twelve normal cultivars had 20 to 32% leaf dry weight yield reduction.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
normale0
Outcome
leaf dry weight yield reductione1
Value
20 to 32%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normal (20 to 32% YR, 12 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–798 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf dry weight yield reduction [YR]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–747 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three sensitive cultivars had 33 to 48% leaf dry weight yield reduction.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Material
sensitivee0
Outcome
leaf dry weight yield reductione1
Value
33 to 48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sensitive (33 to 48% YR, 3 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf dry weight yield reduction [YR]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–747 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five accumulator cultivars had 696 to 730 ppm trifoliolate leaf Zn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
accumulatore0
Outcome
trifoliolate leaf Zne0
Value
696 to 730 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“accumulator (696 to 730 ppm trifoliolate leaf Zn, 5 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven normal cultivars had 549 to 675 ppm Zn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
normale0
Outcome
Zne0
Value
549 to 675 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“normal (549 to 675 ppm Zn, 11 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four excluder cultivars had 389 to 540 ppm Zn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
excludere0
Outcome
Zne0
Value
389 to 540 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excluder (389 to 540 ppm Zn, 4 cultivars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn additions significantly increased root and foliar Mn contents to phytotoxic levels.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Soil Zn additionse0
Outcome
root and foliar Mn contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at both pH 5.5 and 6.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil Zn additions significantly increased root and foliar Mn contents to reported phytotoxic levels at both pH 5.5 and 6.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn additions did not influence extractable soil Mn.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
Soil Zn additionse1
Outcome
DTPA‐TEA extractable soil Mne0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but did not influence DTPA‐TEA extractable soil Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1166 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil Zn additions significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in root and leaf Mn contents.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Outcome
root and leaf Mn contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant cultivar differences in root and leaf Mn contents were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“Twenty soybean ( Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–326 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.