Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn silage yield.

A claim from Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn silage yield.

Treatment
Winter wheat and rye foragee0
Outcome
corn silagee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual foragee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat and rye forage reducedyields of subsequently planted corn and corn silage compared to treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–873

Title

Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation

Kurt D. Thelen; Richard H. Leep Crop Management 2002. doi:10.1094/cm-2002-1218-01-rs

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-2cfeebba210b9b7427e420c86c6ae2474b38dcf14ff2bce7698ec56968ac21bd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Triticum aestivum · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.