Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn 15 kg/ha plus 30×10 spacing gave higher oil content.

A claim from Influence of Zinc and Spacing on Growth and Yield Traits of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn 15 kg/ha plus 30×10 spacing gave higher oil content.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Zn 15 kg/ha + 30×10e0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.26%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment 6 with (Zn 15 kg/ha + 30×10) also recorded significantly higher in yield attributes viz., pods/pant (27.72), kernels/pod (1.92) and seed index (100 seed weight) (39.21 g), pod yield (2773.30 kg/ha), seed yield (1494.67 kg/ha), Haulm yield (5907.67 kg/ha), harvest index (20.18%), oil content (48.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–1024
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69

Title

Influence of Zinc and Spacing on Growth and Yield Traits of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.)

Basineni Santhosh Kumar; C. Umesha International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1531010

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2d8f32095caa03332a74035d400a6336e234da381d8e59d0379d8a64a4810572 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.