Paper · 1997 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Sulphur and Micronutrient Nutrition of Groundnut in a Calcareous Soil

A. L. Singh; V. Chaudhari

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments conducted on a calcareous soil have shown that application of elemental sulphur reduced the chlorosis of groundnut leaves and increased the dry matter, nodule biomass, pod, haulms, and oil yields, and concentration of nutrients in leaf tissue and their uptake by groundnut. The application of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) further helped in recovering the chlorosis of groundnut and increased the above parameters. On average, application of 20 kg S ha −1 as elemental sulphur (S) increased pod yield by 8.6–9.8% and oil yield by 8.8–15%. However, application of 10, 2, and 4 kg ha −1 of Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7% and oil yield by 20.1, 13.9 and 12.2%, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur reduced leaf chlorosis in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
elemental sulphure0
Outcome
chlorosis of groundnut leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of elemental sulphur reduced the chlorosis of groundnut leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur increased groundnut dry matter, nodule biomass and nutrient concentration and uptake.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
dry matter, nodule biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the dry matter, nodule biomass, pod, haulms, and oil yields, and concentration of nutrients in leaf tissue and their uptake by groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur increased groundnut leaf nutrient concentration and uptake.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
elemental sulphure0
Outcome
concentration of nutrients in leaf tissue and their uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of elemental sulphur reduced the chlorosis of groundnut leaves and increased the dry matter, nodule biomass, pod, haulms, and oil yields, and concentration of nutrients in leaf tissue and their uptake by groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur increased groundnut pod and haulm yields.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
elemental sulphure0
Outcome
pod, haulmse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of elemental sulphur reduced the chlorosis of groundnut leaves and increased the dry matter, nodule biomass, pod, haulms, and oil yields, and concentration of nutrients in leaf tissue and their uptake by groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur at 20 kg S ha −1 increased pod yield by 8.6–9.8%.

Treatment
20 kg S ha −1 as elemental sulphure0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.6–9.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 20 kg S ha −1 as elemental sulphur (S) increased pod yield by 8.6–9.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental sulphur at 20 kg S ha −1 increased oil yield by 8.8–15%.

Treatment
20 kg S ha −1 as elemental sulphure0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.8–15%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 20 kg S ha −1 as elemental sulphur (S) increased pod yield by 8.6–9.8% and oil yield by 8.8–15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–574 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application increased pod yield by 19.5%.

Treatment
Fee0
Outcome
podse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.5e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 10, 2, and 4 kg ha −1 of Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased pod yield by 13.6%.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
podse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.6e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 10, 2, and 4 kg ha −1 of Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese application increased pod yield by 11.7%.

Treatment
Mne0
Outcome
podse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of 10, 2, and 4 kg ha −1 of Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application increased oil yield by 20.1%.

Treatment
Fee0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7% and oil yield by 20.1, 13.9 and 12.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased oil yield by 13.9%.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.9e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7% and oil yield by 20.1, 13.9 and 12.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese application increased oil yield by 12.2%.

Treatment
Mne0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fe, Zn and Mn, increased pods by 19.5, 13.6, and 11.7% and oil yield by 20.1, 13.9 and 12.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–717 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

iron atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

iron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

elemental sulfur · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

elemental sulfur · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

manganese atom · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.