Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil sulphur and gypsum significantly increased groundnut chlorophyll a and b.

A claim from Effect of sulphur on prevention of iron chlorosis and plant composition of groundnut on alkaline calcareous soils · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulphur and gypsum significantly increased groundnut chlorophyll a and b.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
250 kg S/ha both of elemental sulphur and gypsume0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of 250 kg S/ha both of elemental sulphur and gypsum significantly increased chlorophyll a and b and concentrations of N, K and S of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–421
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84

Title

Effect of sulphur on prevention of iron chlorosis and plant composition of groundnut on alkaline calcareous soils

M. P. Sahu; H. G. Singh The Journal of Agricultural Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0021859600081016

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d8ea9ca6c46d462ec814f2416e68cc9f3750101f557f26710ecfcff248169e32 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

elemental sulfur · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.