Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment significantly increased total chlorophyll index and number of root nodules.

A claim from Responses of Groundnut to Different Levels of Nutrients with Gypsum in Typical Alfisols under Irrigated Condition · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment significantly increased total chlorophyll index and number of root nodules.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
GG 7e4
Treatment
combined application of 100% RDF along with gypsum @ 50% basal and 50% at 45 DAS and 75% RDF along with gypsum @ 50% basal and 50% at 45 DASe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll index, number of root nodulese2
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Baburayanpettai, Tamil Nadu, Indiae3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Responses of Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22
e0

“the combined application of 100% RDF along with gypsum @ 50% basal and 50% at 45 DAS and 75% RDF along with gypsum @ 50% basal and 50% at 45 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–906
e1

“significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–930
e2

“total chlorophyll index, number of root nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1002
e3

“at SRMCAS, Baburayanpettai, Tamil Nadu, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–365
e4

“The groundnut variety GG 7 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–643

Title

Responses of Groundnut to Different Levels of Nutrients with Gypsum in Typical Alfisols under Irrigated Condition

V. Priyadharshini; P. Balasubramanian; A. Rajeshkumar; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2025. doi:10.18805/lr-5529

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-170b5892f4d2d12ea11c9053f1170ce5fb6607ad19b75c4eec06c9b476a0968f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

lime · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.