Paper · 2011 · Advances in Applied Research

Studies on the Response of Millets, Pulses and Oilseeds to Zinc Fertilization in Red soils

P. Stalin; D. Muthumanickam; T. Chitdeswari; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2004 - 2006 in the Zn deficient light textured red soils with Millets (maize, sorghum), Pulses (green gram, black gram) and Oilseeds (groundnut and sesame) crops as test crops to study their response to graded levels of Zn alone and in combination with FYM @12.5 t ha−1 along with foliar spray of 0.5% ZnSO4 twice. The results revealed that application of 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYM was found to produce comparable grain yields against higher levels of Zn with or without FYM in the test crops viz., maize (6957 kg ha−1), groundnut (1654 kg ha−1) and sesame (830 kg ha−1). However in sorghum and pulses (green gram, black gram), addition of 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYM was found to be beneficial in increasing the grain yield compared to NPK control. Increasing levels of Zn increased the Zn uptake by crops besides sustaining the Zn availability in soil irrespective of crops grown

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield with 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM was comparable to higher Zn levels with or without FYM (6957 kg ha−1).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYMe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
comparablee1
Value
6957 kg ha−1e1
Comparator
higher levels of Zn with or without FYMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYM was found to produce comparable grain yields against higher levels of Zn with or without FYM in the test crops viz., maize (6957 kg ha−1), groundnut (1654 kg ha−1) and sesame (830 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut grain yield with 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM was comparable to higher Zn levels with or without FYM (1654 kg ha−1).

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYMe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
comparablee1
Value
1654 kg ha−1e1
Comparator
higher levels of Zn with or without FYMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYM was found to produce comparable grain yields against higher levels of Zn with or without FYM in the test crops viz., maize (6957 kg ha−1), groundnut (1654 kg ha−1) and sesame (830 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame grain yield with 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM was comparable to higher Zn levels with or without FYM (830 kg ha−1).

Treatment
5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYMe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
comparablee1
Value
830 kg ha−1e1
Comparator
higher levels of Zn with or without FYMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“application of 5.0 kg Zn ha−1 with FYM was found to produce comparable grain yields against higher levels of Zn with or without FYM in the test crops viz., maize (6957 kg ha−1), groundnut (1654 kg ha−1) and sesame (830 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum grain yield increased with 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM compared with the NPK control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Treatment
2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYMe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
NPK controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in sorghum and pulses (green gram, black gram), addition of 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYM was found to be beneficial in increasing the grain yield compared to NPK control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green gram grain yield increased with 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM compared with the NPK control.

Treatment
2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYMe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
NPK controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in sorghum and pulses (green gram, black gram), addition of 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYM was found to be beneficial in increasing the grain yield compared to NPK control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram grain yield increased with 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 plus FYM compared with the NPK control.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe2
Treatment
2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYMe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasinge2
Comparator
NPK controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“in sorghum and pulses (green gram, black gram), addition of 2.5 kg Zn ha−1 + FYM was found to be beneficial in increasing the grain yield compared to NPK control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing levels of Zn increased Zn uptake by crops.

Taxon
cropse3
Treatment
Increasing levels of Zne3
Outcome
Zn uptakee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Increasing levels of Zn increased the Zn uptake by crops besides sustaining the Zn availability in soil irrespective of crops grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing levels of Zn sustained Zn availability in soil irrespective of crop.

Taxon
cropse4
Treatment
Increasing levels of Zne3
Outcome
Zn availability in soile4
Direction
sustaininge4

Verbatim

e3

“Increasing levels of Zn increased the Zn uptake by crops besides sustaining the Zn availability in soil irrespective of crops grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–912 · show in text ↑
e4

“besides sustaining the Zn availability in soil irrespective of crops grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–912 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results differ

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

zinc atom · yield · SorghumResults differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

74 papers: 71 positive, 3 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 391 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results differ

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 200 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

199 papers: 197 positive, 2 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

195 papers more in this group

See all 199 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.