Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same Mn-EAA timing did not reduce efficacy on common lambsquarters.

A claim from Glyphosate Efficacy is Antagonized by Manganese1 · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same Mn-EAA timing did not reduce efficacy on common lambsquarters.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Mn-EAA applied less than 3 d before glyphosatee0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
glyphosate efficacye0
Direction
note0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn-EAA applied less than 3 d before glyphosate reduced glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf but not giant foxtail or common lambsquarters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–734
e1

“soybean, Glycine max L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1769

Title

Glyphosate Efficacy is Antagonized by Manganese1

MARK L. BERNARDS; KURT D. THELEN; DONALD PENNER Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-03-193r2

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-2de6827ea0614bb48312522deeedd28ced9c34f5ed1673361d6b60063b08c8a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · Chenopodium album · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

manganese atom · Chenopodium album · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.