Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Average yield, nutrient uptake and N, P and K harvest indexes were not significantly affected by fertilization.

A claim from Reduction in Nitrogen Rate and Improvement of Nitrogen Use Efficiency without Loss of Peanut Yield by Regional Mean Optimal Rate of Chemical Fertilizer Based on a Multi-Site Field Experiment in the North China Plain · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average yield, nutrient uptake and N, P and K harvest indexes were not significantly affected by fertilization.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
average of yield, nutrition uptake, and harvest indexes of N, P, and Ke0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average of yield, nutrition uptake, and harvest indexes of N, P, and K were not significantly affected by fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1080
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–92

Title

Reduction in Nitrogen Rate and Improvement of Nitrogen Use Efficiency without Loss of Peanut Yield by Regional Mean Optimal Rate of Chemical Fertilizer Based on a Multi-Site Field Experiment in the North China Plain

Jiayu Hu; Yang Yang; Hongyan Zhang; et al. Plants 2023. doi:10.3390/plants12061326

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-2e4fe0f7fbae1c3fd3963aad9a6dbd22edecab307b960e2bc0a68496782c84c9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 17 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this claim · 634 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.