Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The T6 combination gave the highest straw yield, 34.14 q/ha.

A claim from Effect of Foliar and Soil Application of Micro Nutrients and Use of PSB on Productivity and Water Use Efficiency of Chickpea under Rainfed Condition · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The T6 combination gave the highest straw yield, 34.14 q/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
basal application of 100 kg DAP ha-1 and two foliar spraying of 2 % Zinc Sulphate ha-1e2
Outcome
straw yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
34.14 q ha-1e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Increasing basal application of 100 kg DAP ha-1 and two foliar spraying of 2 % Zinc Sulphate ha-1 in splits 25 and 45 DAS ha-1 (T6) resulted in highest seed yield (22.72 q ha-1) and straw yield (34.14 q ha-1), consumptive use (124.05 mm) and water use efficiency (25.87 kg/ha mm-1) and net profit (₹ 72461 ha-1) and B: C ratio (3.45)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–707
t0

“Chickpea under Rainfed Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–148

Title

Effect of Foliar and Soil Application of Micro Nutrients and Use of PSB on Productivity and Water Use Efficiency of Chickpea under Rainfed Condition

Pradeep Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Brij Mohan; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.368

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2e56e5d4baeae67ef5608d5a5a1bedf2b6630aaa1da21ac577c32fdba1e52183 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.