Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphorus 60 kg/ha with PSB produced higher plant height (52.56 cm) in chickpea than the control.

A claim from Effect of Phosphorus and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus 60 kg/ha with PSB produced higher plant height (52.56 cm) in chickpea than the control.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Phosphorus 60kg/ha + PSBe1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
52.56 cme1
Comparator
a controle3
Setting
Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraje2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of Phosphorus 60kg/ha + PSB produced higher plant height (52.56 cm), No. of nodules/plant (23.03), dry weight (8.19g), No. of pods/plant (30.90), No. of seeds/pod (1.53), seed yield (2570.74kg/ha) and stover yield (3583.33kg/ha) in Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1028
e2

“A field experiment was carried out during rabi season of 2022 on Chickpea crop at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraj”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–143
e3

“Biofertilizers (Rhizobium sp., Pseudomonas striata, PSB) and a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–526

Title

Effect of Phosphorus and Biofertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Lalrinzuali; Rajesh Singh; Akankhya Pradhan International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i173207

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2fc18b8d83d672a31bde508a008997dd72d8e4a0ab1ecbdff31860d5fc5ff723 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    The combined treatments significantly increased chickpea growth and dry weight versus control.

    Effect of phosphorus, Sulphur and biofertilizers on growth attributes and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2018 · compared with control /un-inoculated

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    At site 2, chickpea showed no growth response to applied phosphorus.

    Phosphorus nutrition of large-seeded chickpea cv. Macarena ( Cicer arietinum ) in the Ord River Irrigation Area, Western Australia · 1994

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Application of P did not significantly affect chickpea plant height or dry weights in either soil.

    Effect of Phosphorus and Ryzelan on the Growth and Mineral Composition of Chickpeas1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Seed-contact or 2 cm sub-seed TSP suppressed chickpea emergence and early growth in sandy soil.

    EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER PLACEMENT ON EMERGENCE AND EARLY GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Bacterial inoculation significantly increased chickpea growth, shoot phosphorus and nitrogen, nodulation and nitrogenase activity.

    Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture · 2004

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Phosphorus enhanced vegetative growth of chickpea.

    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertility management for desi and kabuli chickpea · 2005

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation was the most effective microbial inoculant for shoot dry weight in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013 · compared with microbial inoculants

    Same direction

  8. positive
    PR treatments had higher relative agronomic effectiveness for shoot DM than SP.

    Phosphorus source, organic matter, and arbuscular mycorrhiza effects on growth and mineral acquisition of chickpea grown in acidic soil · 2000 · compared with SP

    Same direction

49 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.