Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In the Lider 1 variety, presowing seed and one-time foliar treatments increased yield by 0.29 t/ha.

A claim from Application of Microbiological Preparations in the Cultivation of Promising Soybean Varieties in Oryol Oblast · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the Lider 1 variety, presowing seed and one-time foliar treatments increased yield by 0.29 t/ha.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
Lider 1e3
Treatment
presowing seed treatment and one-time foliar treatmente4
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasese3
Value
0.29 t/hae3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield enhancement effect of microbiological preparations on different soybean varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–121
e3

“increases yields to the greatest extent in the Lider 1 (0.29 t/ha), Zusha (0.35 t/ha), and Mezenka (0.40 t/ha) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1591
e4

“applied in the course of presowing seed treatment and one-time foliar treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1429

Title

Application of Microbiological Preparations in the Cultivation of Promising Soybean Varieties in Oryol Oblast

V. I. Zotikov; K. Yu. Zubareva Russian Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.3103/s1068367424700496

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2fcfc5aa72dc09deccec75837182b793a1a99cf74ce39c349d39a5ff8651ae87 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 137 positive, 31 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    GA3 seed treatment reduced soybean leaf area and dry matter yield.

    Gibberellin and cytokinin effects on soybean growth · 2003

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    FeEDDHA seed treatment did not increase seed yield compared with the control.

    A Comparison of Three Methods for Reducing Iron‐Deficiency Chlorosis in Soybean · 2000 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Seed treatments did not consistently produce significant yield differences across cultivars where heavy rain occurred later.

    Integrated Management Strategies for Phytophthora sojae Combining Host Resistance and Seed Treatments · 2009

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    No significant difference in plant stand or yield was observed between neonicotinoid-treated and untreated soybeans.

    Impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments on soil-dwelling pest populations and agronomic parameters in corn and soybean in Quebec (Canada) · 2020 · compared with untreated

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nematicide seed treatment had no effect on soybean yield.

    Corn and Soybean Yield Response to Tillage, Rotation, and Nematicide Seed Treatment · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Seed treatments did not affect plant density, pod density, or seed yield.

    Planting Date and Seed Treatment Effects on Soybean in the Northeastern United States · 2008

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Early seed treatment of soybean does not affect yield.

    Phytotoxicity in soybean seeds treated with phytosanitary products at different application times · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fungicide seed treatment did not improve soybean yields.

    Soybean Emergence from Field Seedbed Environments · 1981

    Opposite direction

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Vapor and/or spray drift that caused soybean terminal bud kill reduced soybean yields.

    Dicamba Volatility · 1979

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not affect soybean seed yield.

    Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar 2,4-D had little effect on soybean yield at prebloom.

    Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram · 1969

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield.

    Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Photosynthesis, Leaf Nutrition, and Yield of Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    K-polyphosphate mix foliar spraying reduced soybean yield by 10.9% on average over two sites.

    Foliage Injury, Nutrient Intake, and Yield of Soybeans as Influenced by Foliar Fertilization1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Mineral N applied at the R5.3 stage, foliar or as topdressing, did not increase soybean grain yield in four field experiments.

    Mineral nitrogen impairs the biological nitrogen fixation in soybean of determinate and indeterminate growth types · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Soil or foliar Fe or Mn did not change soybean root or shoot dry matter yield.

    Influence of foliar and soil applications of iron and manganese on soybean dry matter yield and iron-manganese relationship in a Calcareous soil · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Preharvest treatments, spray volume, and surfactant concentration did not affect soybean yield or harvestable losses.

    Herbicide Combinations for Preharvest Weed Desiccation in Early Maturing Soybean (Glycine max) · 1998

    Opposite direction

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.