Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed soaking and foliar dressing enhanced plant growth indices.

A claim from THE EFFICIENCY OF ORGANIC BIOSTIMULANTS FOR KOHLRABI SEEDS AND PLANTS TREATMENT · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking and foliar dressing enhanced plant growth indices.

Treatment
Soaking the seeds for 12 hours and foliar dressing of plants during vegetation with solutions of growth regulatorse0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes
Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes · TaxonToubib at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking the seeds for 12 hours and foliar dressing of plants during vegetation with solutions of growth regulators contributed not only to increase the total yield of stems but also to enhancing growth indices of kohlrabi plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–362

Title

THE EFFICIENCY OF ORGANIC BIOSTIMULANTS FOR KOHLRABI SEEDS AND PLANTS TREATMENT

Ketskalo V. V; Kononenko L. M; Vyshnevska L. M.; et al. PLANT ARCHIVES 2021. doi:10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.no1.166

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-30d373545a2c19101a9b75dc10da590797d24eff444e555f24f684c7a8ddf60c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

class · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 74 positive, 5 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.