Claim · model-written summary
Peach seedlings did not grow after any pretreatment.
- Taxon
- Peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- Elbertae0
- Outcome
- did not growe0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Peach seedlings (cv. Elberta) did not grow after any of the treatments.”
Title
DG Nichols; DL Jones; WK Thompson Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1974. doi:10.1071/ar9740899
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Apple seedling growth stopped at 12.8° air temperature irrespective of photoperiod and root temperature.
- Intervention effect At 18.3°, apple growth continued but short days and 12.8° root temperature retarded it.
- Intervention effect Apple extension growth and bud break increased with chilling hours.
- Intervention effect Peach extension growth and bud break increased with chilling hours.
- Intervention effect Predormancy factors did not affect apple bud break.
- Intervention effect Low air temperature before chilling increased peach bud break, with a smaller effect after longer chilling.
- Intervention effect Short days before chilling increased peach bud break, with a smaller effect after longer chilling.
- Intervention effect Low predormancy air temperature increased apple growth after chilling.
- Intervention effect Low predormancy air temperature increased peach growth after chilling.
- Intervention effect Short days increased peach growth.
- Intervention effect Long days favored apple growth.
- Intervention effect Apple growth was best with root temperature 12.8°.
- Intervention effect Peach growth at root temperature 12.8° exceeded growth at 18.3° but was below growth at 23.9°.