Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under polyethylene glycol-induced water stress, Desi showed greater capacity to handle oxidative stress than Kabuli.

A claim from Differential Sensitivity of Macrocarpa and Microcarpa Types of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to Water Stress: Association of Contrasting Stress Response with Oxidative Injury · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under polyethylene glycol-induced water stress, Desi showed greater capacity to handle oxidative stress than Kabuli.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
“Desi”e0
Treatment
polyethylene glycol-induced water stresse0
Outcome
capacity of the “Desi” type to deal with oxidative stresse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
“Kabuli”e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyethylene glycol-induced water stress and to 10 μ.mol/L abscisic acid indicated a greater capacity of the “Desi” type to deal with oxidative stress than the “Kabuli” type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2493
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29

Title

Differential Sensitivity of Macrocarpa and Microcarpa Types of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to Water Stress: Association of Contrasting Stress Response with Oxidative Injury

Harsh Nayyar; Smita Singh; Satwinder Kaur; et al. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00350.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-322bc0680d22d5f7a7f604b677e216110d8a73df9c3d5c86101da53a3680d52e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.