Paper · 2022 · Scientific Reports

The regulatory role of γ-aminobutyric acid in chickpea plants depends on drought tolerance and water scarcity level

Maryam Seifikalhor; Vahid Niknam; Sasan Aliniaeifard; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
40
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-protein amino acid with multifunctional roles in dynamic plant responses. To determine the effects of exogenous GABA application (0, 25 and 50 µM) on drought response, two chickpea cultivars with contrasting tolerance to water deficit were examined. Plants were exposed to four irrigation levels (irrigation to 100, 60, 40 and 20% field capacity). Water deficit decreased growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic efficiency. It increased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation owing to both higher ROS accumulation and lower antioxidant enzyme activity. These negative effects of water deficit and the alleviating role of GABA application were more prominent in the sensitive, as compared to the tolerant cultivar. Water deficit also increased proline and GABA contents more in the tolerant cultivar, whereas their content was more enhanced by GABA application in the sensitive one. This may confer an additional level of regulation that results in better alleviation of drought damage in tolerant chickpea cultivars. In conclusion, the stimulatory effect of GABA on growth and physiological modulation depends on both the water stress severity and the cultivar sensitivity to it, implying a probable unknown GABA-related mechanism established by tolerant chickpea cultivars; a lost or not gained mechanism in susceptible ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased chickpea growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit decreased growth, chlorophyll content, and photosynthetic efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It increased electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation owing to both higher ROS accumulation and lower antioxidant enzyme activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–600 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit decreased growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit raised ROS accumulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
ROS accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher ROS accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit decreased growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered antioxidant enzyme activity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Water deficite1
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower antioxidant enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–599 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water deficit decreased growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit effects and GABA alleviation were more pronounced in the sensitive cultivar than the tolerant cultivar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
sensitivee0
Outcome
negative effects of water deficit and the alleviating role of GABA applicatione0
Direction
more prominente0
Comparator
tolerant cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These negative effects of water deficit and the alleviating role of GABA application were more prominent in the sensitive, as compared to the tolerant cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased proline and GABA contents more in the tolerant cultivar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
tolerant cultivare0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
proline and GABA contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit also increased proline and GABA contents more in the tolerant cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GABA application enhanced proline and GABA contents more in the sensitive cultivar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
sensitive onee0
Treatment
GABA applicatione0
Outcome
proline and GABA contentse1
Direction
more enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their content was more enhanced by GABA application in the sensitive one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“proline and GABA contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GABA stimulation of growth and physiology depended on water stress severity and cultivar sensitivity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
GABAe0
Outcome
stimulatory effect of GABA on growth and physiological modulatione0
Qualifier
water stress severity and the cultivar sensitivitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stimulatory effect of GABA on growth and physiological modulation depends on both the water stress severity and the cultivar sensitivity to it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.