Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher irrigation water concentration significantly reduced wheat vegetative growth and yield components.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Water and Spraying with Proline Acid on Growth and Yield Components of Wheat Triticum Aestivum L · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher irrigation water concentration significantly reduced wheat vegetative growth and yield components.

Treatment
irrigation water levels increased from 0 to 4.3 decimen/litere0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yield componentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we observed a significant decrease in vegetative growth and yield components as irrigation water levels increased from 0 to 4.3 decimen/liter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–574
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97

Title

Effect of Irrigation Water and Spraying with Proline Acid on Growth and Yield Components of Wheat Triticum Aestivum L

Tamara Sabah Hadi Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences 2024. doi:10.22194/jgias/12.1152

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-3345a8de18a584ce07b597880a862a1d69b7a03b37d7d428d65662d2375a0928 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Grain yield was higher under sufficient water supply than under drought stress in all cultivars

    Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat · 2017 · compared with drought stress

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    In field trials, Trichoderma koningii applied to the seed furrow increased spring wheat yield by 65% at Mt. Vernon, WA.

    Combination ofTrichoderma koningiiwith Fluorescent Pseudomonads for Control of Take-all on Wheat · 1996

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    One third full irrigation significantly increased wheat yield.

    Stabilizing Rainfed Wheat Yields with Supplemental Irrigation and Nitrogen in a Mediterranean Climate · 1998

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Doubling irrigated land by 2035 with crop intensification could increase wheat production and make Egypt self-sufficient in the near future.

    Can Egypt become self-sufficient in wheat? · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    irrigation at jointing and at jointing plus anthesis improved grain yield by an average of 12.79 and 18.65% across three cropping seasons, respectively, compared with no irrigation

    Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application on grain amino acid composition and protein quality in winter wheat · 2017 · compared with no irrigation

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Each additional 60 mm irrigation increased simulated crop yield by 1.2 t ha −1.

    Modeling Wheat and Maize Productivity as Affected by Climate Variation and Irrigation Supply in North China Plain · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Frequent small irrigations significantly improved biomass yield.

    Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Use in Simulation of Irrigated Winter Wheat Canopy Cover, Biomass, and Grain Yield in the North China Plain · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Extra irrigation increased wheat yield in Sudan and Mexico.

    Wheat Management in Warm Environments: Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers, Irrigation Frequency, and Mulching · 1999

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.