Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Common bean was more responsive to AMF inoculation than maize in terms of yield.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF SOIL FERTILITY AMENDMENT PRACTICES ON EX-SITU UTILISATION OF INDIGENOUS ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE AND COMMON BEAN IN KENYAN HIGHLANDS · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean was more responsive to AMF inoculation than maize in terms of yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
more responsivee1
Comparator
maizee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of the study was to compare the effect of inoculating crops with indigenous AMF applied applied singly or combined with other Soil Fertility Amendment Practices (SFAP) on root colonisation and subsequent performance of maize (Zea mays L.) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1124
e1

“Bean crop was more responsive to AMF inoculation than maize in terms of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2225

Title

INFLUENCE OF SOIL FERTILITY AMENDMENT PRACTICES ON EX-SITU UTILISATION OF INDIGENOUS ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE AND COMMON BEAN IN KENYAN HIGHLANDS

John Nyaga; Joyce Jefwa; Catherine Muthuri; et al. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2014. doi:10.56369/tsaes.1851

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-33dbfcddfe4b5c78c32fc02e263ea45d85023d4eba9b5fc95c7f3422b6737a0d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.