Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Complex fertilizer increased scion phosphorus 20.18% versus control.

A claim from Effects of Different Types of Potassium Fertilizers on Nutrient Uptake by Grapevine · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizer increased scion phosphorus 20.18% versus control.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
complex fertilizere0
Outcome
scion total P contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, the complex fertilizer, potassium nitrate, potassium sulfate, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate treatments increased the scion total P content by 20.18%, 9.77%, 12.52%, and 30.81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1291
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–83

Title

Effects of Different Types of Potassium Fertilizers on Nutrient Uptake by Grapevine

Wenjie Hu; Jin Wang; Qunxian Deng; et al. Horticulturae 2023. doi:10.3390/horticulturae9040470

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-34d99dfd0eb04c4a5c30c4e04c2ba6ffbcf481d1c0c05932f52a8f0ba5dd2355 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.