Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early nicosulfuron failed to control shattercane.

A claim from Herbicide Programs for the Control of ALS-Resistant Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Corn (Zea mays) · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early nicosulfuron failed to control shattercane.

Treatment
EP nicosulfurone0
Interactor
shattercaneSorghum ×drummondiie0weed
Outcome
control shattercanee0
Direction
did not controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early postemergence (EP) and late postemergence (LP) applications of imazethapyr plus imazapyr or EP nicosulfuron did not control shattercane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–942
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–89

Title

Herbicide Programs for the Control of ALS-Resistant Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Corn (Zea mays)

Steven R. King; Edward S. Hagood Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-127r1.1

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-35b82ea65b655de7a2b878bdcdd23065304c40ae73a16dbe826441c75a39d8d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Sorghum x drummondii · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.