Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate effectively controlled the resistant shattercane biotype.

A claim from Herbicide Programs for the Control of ALS-Resistant Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Corn (Zea mays) · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate effectively controlled the resistant shattercane biotype.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
ShattercaneSorghum ×drummondiit0weed
Outcome
control of the resistant biotypee0
Direction
Effective controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum x drummondii
Sorghum ×drummondii · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective control of the resistant biotype was possible with glufosinate or glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–614
t0

“Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–100

Title

Herbicide Programs for the Control of ALS-Resistant Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Corn (Zea mays)

Steven R. King; Edward S. Hagood Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-127r1.1

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-e75da6cd62408125b69cd3c15dea24633885b20751e35db77fd86702239b3439 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · Sorghum x drummondii · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.