Claim · model-written summary
Except for fomesafen, POST herbicides following imazaquin PRE did not improve weed control.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- applications of POST herbicides following imazaquin PREe0
- Interactor
- wild poinsettiat1weed
- Outcome
- weed controle0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
- Qualifier
- with the exception of fomesafene0
- Comparator
- imazaquin PREe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the exception of fomesafen, applications of POST herbicides following imazaquin PRE did not improve weed control”
t0“Soybean (Glycine max) Yield and Quality Responses Associated with Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) Control Programs”
t1“Soybean (Glycine max) Yield and Quality Responses Associated with Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) Control Programs”
Title
Teresa S. Willard; James L. Griffin Weed Technology 1993. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00036976
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect POST herbicides following PRE herbicides enhanced wild poinsettia control relative to PRE herbicides alone.
- Intervention effect Imazaquin gave the highest wild poinsettia control among PRE treatments.
- Intervention effect Adding POST herbicides generally did not increase soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Adding POST herbicides reduced soybean moisture content in one year.
- Intervention effect Adding POST herbicides reduced soybean foreign material content in both years.
- Intervention effect Early POST herbicide application controlled wild poinsettia better than late application in only one year.
- Intervention effect Soybean yields were generally similar between herbicide application times in both years.