Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grain yield did not differ between AFI and W3.

A claim from Assessment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under alternate furrow irrigation in northern China: Grain yield and water use efficiency · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: AFIe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: No differencee0
Comparator: W3e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“No difference in grain yield was observed between AFI and W3”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1317

t0
“winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–49

Title

Assessment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under alternate furrow irrigation in northern China: Grain yield and water use efficiency

D.-Y. Jia; X.-L. Dai; H.-W. Men; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2013. doi:10.4141/cjps2013-224

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect AFI lowered plant transpiration relative to W3 during grain filling.
Intervention effect AFI lowered soil evaporation relative to W3 during grain filling.
Intervention effect AFI reduced biological yield relative to W3.
Intervention effect AFI increased harvest index relative to W3.
Intervention effect AFI increased photosynthetic WUE relative to W3.
Intervention effect AFI increased irrigation WUE and overall WUE relative to W3.
Recommendation Authors recommend AFI as an irrigation schedule that maintains acceptable yield while reducing water consumption.

Record rev-3768c5ffa016e3f8932fcd5b876e4c8b0541d47c1a1c8ae21bd6b2693a99861a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

191 papers in the same direction as this claim · 797 reporting no difference from an alternative

positive
VAFI had superior grain production to FAFI in both study areas.
Effects of Alternate Furrow Irrigation and Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Water-and Nitrogen-Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) · 2008 · compared with FAFI
No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper
positive
Grain yield was higher under sufficient water supply than under drought stress in all cultivars
Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat · 2017 · compared with drought stress
No difference from an alternative
positive
In field trials, Trichoderma koningii applied to the seed furrow increased spring wheat yield by 65% at Mt. Vernon, WA.
Combination ofTrichoderma koningiiwith Fluorescent Pseudomonads for Control of Take-all on Wheat · 1996
No difference from an alternative
positive
One third full irrigation significantly increased wheat yield.
Stabilizing Rainfed Wheat Yields with Supplemental Irrigation and Nitrogen in a Mediterranean Climate · 1998
No difference from an alternative
positive
Doubling irrigated land by 2035 with crop intensification could increase wheat production and make Egypt self-sufficient in the near future.
Can Egypt become self-sufficient in wheat? · 2018
No difference from an alternative
positive
irrigation at jointing and at jointing plus anthesis improved grain yield by an average of 12.79 and 18.65% across three cropping seasons, respectively, compared with no irrigation
Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application on grain amino acid composition and protein quality in winter wheat · 2017 · compared with no irrigation
No difference from an alternative
positive
Each additional 60 mm irrigation increased simulated crop yield by 1.2 t ha −1.
Modeling Wheat and Maize Productivity as Affected by Climate Variation and Irrigation Supply in North China Plain · 2010
No difference from an alternative
positive
Frequent small irrigations significantly improved biomass yield.
Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Use in Simulation of Irrigated Winter Wheat Canopy Cover, Biomass, and Grain Yield in the North China Plain · 2014
No difference from an alternative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results