Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T9 gave significantly higher number of nodules/plant (81.67).

A claim from Effect of gypsum and naphthalene acetic acid on growth and yield of summer groundnut · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 gave significantly higher number of nodules/plant (81.67).

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Gypsum (400kg/ha) + NAA (50ppm)e0
Outcome
number of nodules/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
81.67e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–84
e0

“treatment-T9 [Gypsum (400kg/ha) + NAA (50ppm)] was found to be significantly higher in growth parameters viz, plant height (62.27 cm), number of nodules/plant (81.67), plant dry weight (54.80 g), cgr (40.71 g/m2/day), yield attributing parameters viz, number of pods/plant (17.67), seed index (37.97 g) and yield parameters viz, kernel yield (3.73 t/ha), haulm yield (6.61 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–863

Title

Effect of gypsum and naphthalene acetic acid on growth and yield of summer groundnut

Padala Anusha; Victor Debbarma; Palakurthi Pooja International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i5a.2862

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-38b33fbfb021d8451f5e01b179708f27d242dc812554bdf07684a50340f458cd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.