Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fifteen-day irrigation with fulvic acid and algae extract increased tuber diameter.

A claim from RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen-day irrigation with fulvic acid and algae extract increased tuber diameter.

Taxon
SWEET POTATOIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
irrigation every 15 days intervals and treating with fulvic acid at 10 kg /fad. as soil application+ spraying with algae extract at 1 g/le0
Outcome
tuber root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between irrigation every 15 days intervals and treating with fulvic acid at 10 kg /fad. as soil application+ spraying with algae extract at 1 g/l increased N and P in shoots and tuber roots as well as tuber root diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1826
t0

“SWEET POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45

Title

RESPONSE OF YIELD AND QUALITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS TO IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION TREATMENTS

Hamada El- Metwaly Journal of Productivity and Development 2021. doi:10.21608/jpd.2021.141706

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-38fed8a577b8f21ee76240231e130e1cf6eddb0e90629476ab1337b29f6696bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.