Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Multiple commercial calcium foliar sprays did not affect fruit flesh calcium concentration at harvest.

A claim from Influence of In-Season Foliar Calcium Sprays onFruit Quality and Surface Discoloration Incidence of Peaches andNectarines · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Multiple commercial calcium foliar sprays did not affect fruit flesh calcium concentration at harvest.

Treatment
Multiple commercial calcium foliar sprayse2
Outcome
fruit flesh calcium concentration at harveste2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Foliar calcium sprays applied every 14 days, starting two weeks after full bloom and continuing until one week before harvest, did not reduce surface discoloration or increase fruit quality of mid- or late season peach and nectarine cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–242
e2

“Multiple commercial calcium foliar sprays did not affect fruit soluble solids concentration (SSC), fruit firmness, fruit internal breakdown, and fruit flesh calcium concentration at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–433

Title

Influence of In-Season Foliar Calcium Sprays onFruit Quality and Surface Discoloration Incidence of Peaches andNectarines

Carlos H. Crisosto; Kevin R. Day; R. Scott Johnson; et al. Journal of American Pomological Society 2000. doi:10.71318/apom.2000.54.3.118

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-39b671f561a625027b19aa6aa78c97eabf7bf46c8ce509b25d61081a3364276c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect
See all 9 papers →

application · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.