Abstract
과실비대기 중에 수산화칼슘의 엽면살포가 '대월' 복숭아의 수체생육 및 과실품질에 미치는 영향을 구명하고자 실험을 수행하였다. 적과 후 수산화칼슘 1, 2, 5, 10 $g{\cdot}L^{-1}$을 일주일 간격으로 엽면살포한 결과, 신초생장은 대조구에 비해 현저히 억제되었다. 신초 기부로부터 5번째 잎의 엽색도를 측정한 결과, 수산화칼슘 엽면살포구에서 평균 42.1 SCDSV로 대조구의 40.9 SCDSV보다 높게 나타났으며, 광합성률은 수산화칼슘을 고농도로 처리할수록 크게 증가하였다. 과실 품질을 조사한 결과, 과중은 고농도의 수산화칼슘을 처리할 수록 유의하게 증가하였다. 당 함량은 대조구가 8.78 $^{\circ}Brix$로 가장 낮았던 반면, 수산화칼슘 처리구에서 9.17, 9.22, 9.71, 10.58 $^{\circ}Brix$로 고농도로 처리할수록 증가하였다. 산도와 안토시아닌 함량은 모든 처리구에서 유의성이 인정되지 않았으며 과피와 과육의 경도는 고농도의 수산화칼슘 처리에 의해 유의하게 증가하였다. 잎의 형태적 관찰 결과, 대조구의 책상조직(63.5 ${\mu}m$)에 비하여, 수산화칼슘 처리구는 86.5, 87.5, 93.6, 107.4 ${\mu}m$로 처리농도가 높을수록 조직이 건전하게 유지되고 잎의 두께 또한 증가하였다. 과실의 표피와 하피의 세포벽을 관찰한 결과, 수산화칼슘 엽면살포에 의해 세포벽의 두께가 증가하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. The effects of foliar spray of calcium hydroxide ($Ca(OH)_2$) during fruit growth period was investigated by changes of the shoot growth and fruit quality in 'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica). Since foliar spray of $Ca(OH)_2$ 1, 2, 5, and 10 $g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ at 7 day-intervals after fruit thinning, shoot growth was remarkably decreased compared with control group. An average SPAD value of fifth leaf from proximal part of the shoot was higher as 42.1 specific color difference sensor value (SCDSV) of $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatments than 40.9 SCDSV of control group. Photosynthesis rates were also significantly increased by treating $Ca(OH)_2$ of higher concentration. Among fruit characteristics affecting quality, fruit weight was increased depending on concentration of $Ca(OH)_2$ treatment. The soluble solids content was lowest in control group (8.78 $^{\circ}Brix$) compare with higher concentrations of $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatment in each 9.17, 9.22, 9.71, 10.58 $^{\circ}Brix$. The acidity and anthocyanin contents were no significant differences among treatment, but firmness of pericarp and flesh of fruits was significantly increased by $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatment. As a results of morphological observation of leaf, thickness of palisade parenchyma was thinner in control group (63.5 ${\mu}m$) than those of each 86.5, 87.5, 93.6, 107.4 ${\mu}m$ in $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatment. Higher $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray also increased the thickness of cell wall of epidermis and hypodermis in 'Daewol' fruit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium hydroxide spray markedly decreased shoot growth relative to controls.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- Daewole0
- Treatment
- foliar spray of $Ca(OH)_2$e2
- Outcome
- shoot growthe1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“shoot growth was remarkably decreased compared with control group.”
e2“foliar spray of $Ca(OH)_2$ 1, 2, 5, and 10 $g{\cdot}L^{-1}$ at 7 day-intervals”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar calcium hydroxide increased fifth-leaf SPAD value to an average 42.1 versus 40.9 in controls.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Organ / stage
- fifth leafe1
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatmentse1
- Outcome
- SPAD valuee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 42.1 specific color difference sensor value (SCDSV)e1
- Qualifier
- 40.9 SCDSVe1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“An average SPAD value of fifth leaf from proximal part of the shoot was higher as 42.1 specific color difference sensor value (SCDSV) of $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatments than 40.9 SCDSV of control group.”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher calcium hydroxide concentrations significantly increased photosynthesis rates.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ of higher concentratione1
- Outcome
- Photosynthesis ratese1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“Photosynthesis rates were also significantly increased by treating $Ca(OH)_2$ of higher concentration.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight increased with calcium hydroxide concentration.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ treatmente1
- Outcome
- fruit weighte1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“fruit weight was increased depending on concentration of $Ca(OH)_2$ treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soluble solids rose with calcium hydroxide concentration from a control low of 8.78 °Brix to treatment values up to 10.58 °Brix.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- higher concentrations of $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatmente1
- Outcome
- soluble solids contente1
- Direction
- loweste1
- Value
- 10.58 $^{\circ}Brix$e1
- Qualifier
- 8.78 $^{\circ}Brix$e1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“The soluble solids content was lowest in control group (8.78 $^{\circ}Brix$) compare with higher concentrations of $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatment in each 9.17, 9.22, 9.71, 10.58 $^{\circ}Brix$.”
Claim · model-written summary
Acidity did not differ significantly among calcium hydroxide treatments.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatmente2
- Outcome
- aciditye1
- Direction
- no significant differencese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“The acidity and anthocyanin contents were no significant differences among treatment”
e2“$Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Anthocyanin contents did not differ significantly among calcium hydroxide treatments.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatmente2
- Outcome
- anthocyanin contentse1
- Direction
- no significant differencese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“The acidity and anthocyanin contents were no significant differences among treatment”
e2“$Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium hydroxide significantly increased firmness of pericarp and fruit flesh.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatmente1
- Outcome
- firmness of pericarp and flesh of fruitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“firmness of pericarp and flesh of fruits was significantly increased by $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium hydroxide spray increased palisade parenchyma thickness over controls.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatmente1
- Outcome
- thickness of palisade parenchymae1
- Direction
- thinnere1
- Value
- 107.4 ${\mu}m$e1
- Qualifier
- 63.5 ${\mu}m$e1
- Comparator
- control groupe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“thickness of palisade parenchyma was thinner in control group (63.5 ${\mu}m$) than those of each 86.5, 87.5, 93.6, 107.4 ${\mu}m$ in $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraying treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher calcium hydroxide spray increased epidermal and hypodermal cell-wall thickness in Daewol fruit.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- Higher $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spraye1
- Outcome
- thickness of cell wall of epidermis and hypodermise1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Daewol' peach (Prunus persica)”
e1“Higher $Ca(OH)_2$ foliar spray also increased the thickness of cell wall of epidermis and hypodermis in 'Daewol' fruit.”
The same questions in other papers
calcium atom · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →calcium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
calcium atom · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →calcium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
application · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.