Abstract
Abstract ‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening in the fruits. Distribution of ‘Dixon’ fruits by color at harvest revealed that the fruits on the lower and upper halves of the treated trees were more uniformly colored than those from non-sprayed trees. Furthermore, maturity was advanced approximately 6 days. Fruits from trees in which just the lower half was treated were, likewise, more uniform than the controls but maturity was advanced only 2 to 3 days. The advancement in maturity was evidenced by increased carotene, lower acid, and higher soluble solids. At the same stage of ripeness, fruits treated with Alar were firmer than those harvested from the check trees. The maturity of ‘Independence’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ fruits was advanced 2 and 5 days, respectively, by Alar treatments. The physical and chemical changes which accompanied the ripening processes were similar to those found in the ‘Dixon’ fruits. Concomitant with the earlier ripening induced by Alar, the rates of CO 2 and ethylene evolution began to increase early in the treated fruits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Fruits on lower and upper halves of Alar-treated 'Dixon' peach trees were more uniformly colored at harvest than fruits from non-sprayed trees.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- ‘Dixon’e1
- Treatment
- sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar)e0
- Outcome
- uniformly colorede1
- Direction
- moree1
- Comparator
- non-sprayed treese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“Distribution of ‘Dixon’ fruits by color at harvest revealed that the fruits on the lower and upper halves of the treated trees were more uniformly colored than those from non-sprayed trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar advanced maturity of 'Dixon' peach fruits by approximately 6 days.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- ‘Dixon’e1
- Treatment
- sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar)e0
- Outcome
- maturitye2
- Direction
- advancede2
- Value
- approximately 6 dayse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“Distribution of ‘Dixon’ fruits by color at harvest revealed that the fruits on the lower and upper halves of the treated trees were more uniformly colored than those from non-sprayed trees”
e2“maturity was advanced approximately 6 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruits from trees with only the lower half treated were more uniform than the controls.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- just the lower half was treatede1
- Outcome
- more uniforme1
- Direction
- more uniforme1
- Comparator
- the controlse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“Fruits from trees in which just the lower half was treated were, likewise, more uniform than the controls but maturity was advanced only 2 to 3 days”
Claim · model-written summary
In trees with only the lower half treated, maturity was advanced only 2 to 3 days.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- just the lower half was treatede1
- Outcome
- maturitye1
- Direction
- advancede1
- Value
- 2 to 3 dayse1
- Comparator
- the controlse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“Fruits from trees in which just the lower half was treated were, likewise, more uniform than the controls but maturity was advanced only 2 to 3 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar treatment increased carotene in peach fruits as evidence of advanced maturity.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar)e0
- Outcome
- carotenee1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“increased carotene, lower acid, and higher soluble solids”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar treatment lowered acid in peach fruits as evidence of advanced maturity.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar)e0
- Outcome
- acide1
- Direction
- lowere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“increased carotene, lower acid, and higher soluble solids”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar treatment increased soluble solids in peach fruits as evidence of advanced maturity.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar)e0
- Outcome
- soluble solidse1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“increased carotene, lower acid, and higher soluble solids”
Claim · model-written summary
At the same stage of ripeness, Alar-treated fruits were firmer than fruits from check trees.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- treated with Alare1
- Outcome
- firmere1
- Direction
- firmere1
- Comparator
- check treese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“fruits treated with Alar were firmer than those harvested from the check trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar advanced maturity of 'Independence' nectarine fruits by 2 days.
- Taxon
- nectarine
Prunus persica var. nucipersicae0 - Material
- ‘Independence’e1
- Treatment
- Alar treatmentse1
- Outcome
- maturitye1
- Direction
- advancede1
- Value
- 2e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“The maturity of ‘Independence’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ fruits was advanced 2 and 5 days, respectively, by Alar treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar advanced maturity of 'Fay Elberta' peach fruits by 5 days.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Material
- ‘Fay Elberta’e1
- Treatment
- Alar treatmentse1
- Outcome
- maturitye1
- Direction
- advancede1
- Value
- 5 dayse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“The maturity of ‘Independence’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ fruits was advanced 2 and 5 days, respectively, by Alar treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
With earlier ripening induced by Alar, rates of CO2 and ethylene evolution began to increase early in the treated fruits.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- induced by Alare1
- Outcome
- rates of CO 2 and ethylene evolutione1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“‘Dixon’ and ‘Fay Elberta’ peach and ‘Independence’ nectarine trees were sprayed with succinic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazide (Alar) at the onset of pit hardening”
e1“Concomitant with the earlier ripening induced by Alar, the rates of CO 2 and ethylene evolution began to increase early in the treated fruits”
The same questions in other papers
Daminozide · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Daminozide · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
application · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.