Paper · 2006 · Horticultural Science

Effects of different sources of iron, hormones and Agrobacterium tumefaciens on the chlorophyll and iron concentration in the leaves of peach trees

C. Tsipouridis; D. Almaliotis; T. Thomidis; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different sources of iron, hormones and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in the chlorophyll and iron concentration of the peach cultivars Katerina and Fire Blight. The results showed that the concentration of Fe in the leaves was significantly increased after spraying with FeSO4.7H2O (alone or in combination with KNO3, urea, citric acid or ascorbic acid) or with GA3 + Kinetin. Soil applications with Fe-EDDHA also significantly increased the iron concentration in leaves. Chlorophyll (a/b) increased only in trees sprayed with citric acid or H2SO4 60 days after application. SPAD chlorophyll measurements showed that Fe-EDDHA and FeSO4.7H2O + organic matter, applied as soil drench, significantly increased the chlorophyll concentration in leaves of Katerina even up to 120 days after application. Foliar treatments had no significant effect on the SPAD index. SPAD measurements also showed that the concentrations of chlorophyll in leaves of the rootstocks St. Julien 655/2 and wild seedling rootstocks were significantly lower than in GF677 and Antafuel. The rootstocks inoculated with the A. tumefaciens strain Ag-28 alone showed a significantly lower chlorophyll concentration than the uninoculated ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FeSO4.7H2O sprays increased leaf iron significantly.

Treatment
FeSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
concentration of Fe in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentration of Fe in the leaves was significantly increased after spraying with FeSO4.7H2O (alone or in combination with KNO3, urea, citric acid or ascorbic acid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 plus kinetin sprays increased leaf iron significantly.

Treatment
GA3 + Kinetine0
Outcome
concentration of Fe in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentration of Fe in the leaves was significantly increased after spraying with FeSO4.7H2O (alone or in combination with KNO3, urea, citric acid or ascorbic acid) or with GA3 + Kinetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–426 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Fe-EDDHA increased leaf iron significantly.

Treatment
Fe-EDDHAe0
Outcome
iron concentration in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil applications with Fe-EDDHA also significantly increased the iron concentration in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric acid spray increased chlorophyll a/b at 60 days.

Treatment
citric acide0
Outcome
Chlorophyll (a/b)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
60 days after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll (a/b) increased only in trees sprayed with citric acid or H2SO4 60 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2SO4 spray increased chlorophyll a/b at 60 days.

Treatment
H2SO4e0
Outcome
Chlorophyll (a/b)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll (a/b) increased only in trees sprayed with citric acid or H2SO4 60 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Fe-EDDHA increased Katerina leaf chlorophyll through 120 days.

Material
Katerinae0
Treatment
Fe-EDDHAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration in leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 120 days after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe-EDDHA and FeSO4.7H2O + organic matter, applied as soil drench, significantly increased the chlorophyll concentration in leaves of Katerina even up to 120 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil FeSO4.7H2O plus organic matter increased Katerina leaf chlorophyll through 120 days.

Material
Katerinae0
Treatment
FeSO4.7H2O + organic mattere0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe-EDDHA and FeSO4.7H2O + organic matter, applied as soil drench, significantly increased the chlorophyll concentration in leaves of Katerina even up to 120 days after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatments did not significantly change the SPAD index.

Treatment
Foliar treatmentse0
Outcome
SPAD indexe0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar treatments had no significant effect on the SPAD index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

St. Julien 655/2 rootstocks had lower leaf chlorophyll than GF677 and Antafuel.

Material
St. Julien 655/2e0
Outcome
concentrations of chlorophyll in leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
GF677 and Antafuele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of chlorophyll in leaves of the rootstocks St. Julien 655/2 and wild seedling rootstocks were significantly lower than in GF677 and Antafuel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild seedling rootstocks had lower leaf chlorophyll than GF677 and Antafuel.

Material
wild seedling rootstockse0
Outcome
concentrations of chlorophyll in leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
GF677 and Antafuele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of chlorophyll in leaves of the rootstocks St. Julien 655/2 and wild seedling rootstocks were significantly lower than in GF677 and Antafuel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ag-28 inoculation lowered rootstock leaf chlorophyll relative to uninoculated rootstocks.

Treatment
inoculated with the A. tumefaciens strain Ag-28e0
Interactor
A. tumefaciens strain Ag-28Agrobacterium tumefaciense0pathogen
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
uninoculated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rootstocks inoculated with the A. tumefaciens strain Ag-28 alone showed a significantly lower chlorophyll concentration than the uninoculated ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–147 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.