Paper · 1999 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Effects of Various Iron Fertilizers and Rates on Some Micro Nutrients Contents of Peach Trees

Haluk Başar; Ahmet Özgümüş

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was implemented in order to determine the effects of various iron fertilizers and doses on some micronutrients contents of peach leaves. The filed experiments were established in randomized plots experimental design with six replications in three different orchards at Karabalçık, Çağlayanköy and Barakfaki districts in Bursa plain. As iron fertilizers, Sequestrene 138 Fe (100, 200 and 300 grams per tree) and iron sulphate (500 and 1000 grams per tree) in combination with 10 kg of FYM were applied to soils in early spring. According to the results, Sequestrene 138 Fe applied trees had significantly lower Mn levels than control and iron sulphate applied trees. Zn and Cu contents of the leaves were not affected by the treatments. Differences among the treatments for active and total Fe in the leaves were found to be statistically significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequestrene 138 Fe lowered leaf Mn compared with control and iron sulphate.

Taxon
Peach TreesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Sequestrene 138 Fee0
Outcome
Mn levelse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control and iron sulphate applied treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequestrene 138 Fe applied trees had significantly lower Mn levels than control and iron sulphate applied trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Zn and Cu contents were unaffected by treatments.

Taxon
Peach TreesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
Zn and Cu contents of the leavese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn and Cu contents of the leaves were not affected by the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf active and total Fe differed among treatments.

Taxon
Peach TreesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
active and total Fe in the leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences among the treatments for active and total Fe in the leaves were found to be statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.