Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing boron fertilization significantly increased root and sugar yields.

A claim from Productivity and Quality of Sugar Beet in Relation to Humic Acid and Boron Fertilization Under Nubaria Conditions · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing boron fertilization significantly increased root and sugar yields.

Treatment
boron fertilization rates from zero to 400 g/fed, 800 g/fed and 1200 g/fede0
Outcome
root yield, sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
zeroe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing boron fertilization rates from zero to 400 g/fed, 800 g/fed and 1200 g/fed increased significantly the mean values of root yield, sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–2070
e1

“sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–293

Title

Productivity and Quality of Sugar Beet in Relation to Humic Acid and Boron Fertilization Under Nubaria Conditions

Ibrahim.F. Rehab; Samia S. El Maghraby; E. E. Kandil; et al. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2019. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2019.29029

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-39fedf68efd43c2888a554c89807116f03519d85380e796c8d3a24a616c52d9e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.