Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Slow-release boron fertilizer increased white sugar yield by 3.5 to 35.7% in black soil.

A claim from Slow-release boron fertilizer improves yield and nutritional profile of Beta vulgaris L. grown in Northeast China by increasing boron supply capacity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow-release boron fertilizer increased white sugar yield by 3.5 to 35.7% in black soil.

Treatment
Slow-release B fertilizere0
Outcome
white sugar yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.5 to 35.7%e0
Setting
black soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slow-release B fertilizer increased white sugar yield by 3.5 to 35.7% in black soil and 5.8 to 20.8% in albic soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1153
e1

“improved sugar beet net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–665

Title

Slow-release boron fertilizer improves yield and nutritional profile of Beta vulgaris L. grown in Northeast China by increasing boron supply capacity

Zhenzhen Wu; Xiaoyu Zhao; Jean Wan Hong Yong; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1441226

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-18ccdbe13d0fd07b6d4d64b80e94783405d6985e23793498ab9f13f4d4c152b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.