Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boron fertilizer increased surose (Pol) content.

A claim from Slow-release boron fertilizer improves yield and nutritional profile of Beta vulgaris L. grown in Northeast China by increasing boron supply capacity · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilizer increased surose (Pol) content.

Treatment
boron fertilizere0
Outcome
surose (Pol) contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“boron fertilizer greatly increased root B accumulation, as evidenced by decreasing amino N and Na contents alongside increasing surose (Pol) content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1037
e1

“improved sugar beet net photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–665

Title

Slow-release boron fertilizer improves yield and nutritional profile of Beta vulgaris L. grown in Northeast China by increasing boron supply capacity

Zhenzhen Wu; Xiaoyu Zhao; Jean Wan Hong Yong; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1441226

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-62d97dffd3b31dbeb1d4710356ebfdfba941c2353145e4c82a33249a283e817f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.