Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations increased system yield, profitability and production and economic efficiency.

A claim from Effect of irrigation schedule, residue incorporation and nutrient management on system productivity and profitability of soybean (Glycine max)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Vertisols of Rajasthan · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations increased system yield, profitability and production and economic efficiency.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
2 irrigations at flowering and other at pod development stagese2
Outcome
soybean-equivalent yield (SEY), profitability, production- and economic-efficiency of systeme0
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
1 irrigation at flowering stagee3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of wheat, soybean-equivalent yield (SEY), profitability, production- and economic-efficiency of system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1600
e1

“significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1336
e2

“2 irrigations at flowering and other at pod development stages-in soybean crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1312
e3

“as compared to 1 irrigation at flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1723
t0

“soybean (Glycine max)wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–167

Title

Effect of irrigation schedule, residue incorporation and nutrient management on system productivity and profitability of soybean (Glycine max)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in Vertisols of Rajasthan

R.S. NAROLIA; PRATAP SINGH; BALDEV RAM; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v65i1.2963

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-3a5e2e27c8063d38c5d4b31212016dba05b8e780bd2b4012550781438c81d735 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

stage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 71 positive, 50 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.