Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher grains per cob, grains per pod, and grain yield than minimum tillage under the specified residue and fertilizer practice.

A claim from Effect of Resource Conservation Practices on Productivity of Maize Intercropped with Soybean under Maize + Soybean – Wheat Cropping System and Soil Microbial Population · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher grains per cob, grains per pod, and grain yield than minimum tillage under the specified residue and fertilizer practice.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
number of grains per cob and number of grains per pod grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher plant height, leaf area index, dry matter production (g/m2), number of plants/sqm, number of rows per cob, number of pods per plant, number of grains per cob and number of grains per pod grain yield, stover yield and harvest index was found under conventional tillage as compare to minimum tillage with mulching @ 5ton paddy straw in conjugation with 75% RDF + 25% N through FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1199
t0

“Maize Intercropped with Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92

Title

Effect of Resource Conservation Practices on Productivity of Maize Intercropped with Soybean under Maize + Soybean – Wheat Cropping System and Soil Microbial Population

Parshotam Kumar; Dileep Kachroo; N.P. Thakur; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.050

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-3ad64d2c32e16a2da25fa2a72c65a05d96eac8b55ea90778be10a3c5e3574960 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.