Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cryopreserved embryogenic suspension cultures of Picea sitchensis, frozen by the optimised protocol, grew at rates equal to those of untreated unfrozen cultures after thawing.

A claim from Cryopreservation of an embryogenic suspension culture of Picea sitchensis and subsequent plant regeneration · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved embryogenic suspension cultures of Picea sitchensis, frozen by the optimised protocol, grew at rates equal to those of untreated unfrozen cultures after thawing.

Taxon
Picea sitchensisPicea sitchensise2
Treatment
preculture in medium containing 0.4 M sorbitol and pretreatment with 5% (v/v) DMSOe3
Outcome
growth rates of cell culturese1
Direction
equal toe1
Comparator
untreated unfrozen culturese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“After thawing in a waterbath at 45°C the growth rates of cell cultures cryopreserved by this method were equal to growth rates of untreated unfrozen cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–552
e2

“Embryogenic suspension cultures of sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were successfully cryopreserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98
e3

“The best method for cyropreservation as demonstrated by regrowth tests was: 1) preculture in medium containing 0.4 M sorbitol and pretreatment with 5% (v/v) DMSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–261

Title

Cryopreservation of an embryogenic suspension culture of Picea sitchensis and subsequent plant regeneration

Jens I. Find; Franz Floto; Peter Krogstrup; et al. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1993. doi:10.1080/02827589309382765

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-3b6947fc98f47e18af96d04fff84b30120b7962df20e0fba5bc78e492150ce82 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

in vitro · growth · Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.