Paper · 1993 · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Cryopreservation of an embryogenic suspension culture of Picea sitchensis and subsequent plant regeneration

Jens I. Find; Franz Floto; Peter Krogstrup; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
32
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Embryogenic suspension cultures of sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were successfully cryopreserved. The best method for cyropreservation as demonstrated by regrowth tests was: 1) preculture in medium containing 0.4 M sorbitol and pretreatment with 5% (v/v) DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide), 2) freezing the cultures at a cooling rate of 0.5°Cmin‐1 to —40°C followed by transfer to LN (liquid nitrogen). After thawing in a waterbath at 45°C the growth rates of cell cultures cryopreserved by this method were equal to growth rates of untreated unfrozen cultures. The cryopreserved cultures gave rise to mature somatic embryos which developed cotyledons, roots and shoots 3–4 months after thawing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved embryogenic suspension cultures of Picea sitchensis, frozen by the optimised protocol, grew at rates equal to those of untreated unfrozen cultures after thawing.

Taxon
Picea sitchensisPicea sitchensise2
Treatment
preculture in medium containing 0.4 M sorbitol and pretreatment with 5% (v/v) DMSOe3
Outcome
growth rates of cell culturese1
Direction
equal toe1
Comparator
untreated unfrozen culturese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“After thawing in a waterbath at 45°C the growth rates of cell cultures cryopreserved by this method were equal to growth rates of untreated unfrozen cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–552 · show in text ↑
e2

“Embryogenic suspension cultures of sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were successfully cryopreserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best method for cyropreservation as demonstrated by regrowth tests was: 1) preculture in medium containing 0.4 M sorbitol and pretreatment with 5% (v/v) DMSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cryopreserved cultures gave rise to mature somatic embryos that developed cotyledons, roots and shoots.

Taxon
Picea sitchensisPicea sitchensise2
Outcome
mature somatic embryos which developed cotyledons, roots and shootse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea sitchensis
Picea sitchensis · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Embryogenic suspension cultures of sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were successfully cryopreserved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“The cryopreserved cultures gave rise to mature somatic embryos which developed cotyledons, roots and shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–661 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.