Intervention effectmodel-written summary

S applied at seeding was generally more effective for canola than S applied at bolting and early flowering.

A claim from Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S applied at seeding was generally more effective for canola than S applied at bolting and early flowering.

Treatment
applications at seedinge6
Outcome
yield, seed quality and S uptakee6
Direction
more effectivee6
Comparator
bolting and early flowering stagese6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“application of sulphate-S fertilizer on S-deficient soils improved yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola, with applications at seeding generally more effective than at bolting and early flowering stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2567–2774

Title

Effectiveness of sulphate-S fertilization at different growth stages for yield, seed quality and S uptake of canola

S. S. Malhi; K. S. Gill Canadian Journal of Plant Science 2002. doi:10.4141/p01-184

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-3bbc1ff6ffd677c7e1b924a1e5ee88b3be993f860eb0ddfb0a96069599d06edb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer