Claim · model-written summary
Growth performance of oat after late waterlogging was not affected.
- Taxon
- Oat
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- late waterlogginge0
- Outcome
- growth performancee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“growth performance after late waterlogging and grain yield of all three oat varieties at maturity was not affected”
t0“Oat”
Title
Oat—an alternative crop under waterlogging stress?
Britta Pitann; Karl H. Mühling Frontiers in Plant Science 2024. doi:10.3389/fpls.2024.1386039
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Vegetative growth of oat was impaired after early waterlogging and remained impaired until maturity.
- Mechanism Transient nutrient deficiencies were given as the main reason for the impaired vegetative growth of oat after early waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Grain yield of all three oat varieties at maturity was not affected by waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Late waterlogging at the beginning generative stage increased oat grain yield.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that oats, independently of cultivar, should be considered a good alternative in crop production, especially when waterlogging is expected during cultivation.