Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More intensive tillage favored maize grain yield over reduced tillage.

A claim from Influence of tillage methods on some agricultural properties of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glicine max L.) crops · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More intensive tillage favored maize grain yield over reduced tillage.

Taxon
corn (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
More intensive tillage varijantse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
more favourablee0
Comparator
reduced tillage methodse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More intensive tillage varijants hade a more favourable influence on the height of maize plants, ear yield and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–500
t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82
e1

“reduced tillage methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1022

Title

Influence of tillage methods on some agricultural properties of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glicine max L.) crops

Ivka Kvaternjak; Andrija Špoljar; Ivica Kisić; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-3d69b992d96e5f291c1d8ac91008721b7b285609cfb2ac4ab72277acd9f0f3b2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.