Abstract
The research was conducted on stagnic luvisol of loamy texture (N: 460 01´ 12ʺ ; E: 160 34´ 28˜) on testing ground of Križevci College of Agriculture. Research objectives were related to determining the influence of different tillage methods on the height of maize and soybean plants, number of soybean pods, average number of seeds in the pod, ear yield and maize grain yield. More intensive tillage varijants hade a more favourable influence on the height of maize plants, ear yield and grain yield, i. e. the application of autumn basic soil tillage achieved better results for almost all researched agricultural properties. In the process of soybean cultivation, the most intesive tillage method indicated the biggest plant height and the biggest number of pods per plant, as well as the highest number of seeds within a pod (variant E). It was established that more intensive tillage had more favourable influence on the researched agricultural properties of maize and soybean in comparison to reduced tillage methods.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
More intensive tillage favored maize plant height over reduced tillage.
- Treatment
- More intensive tillage varijantse0
- Outcome
- height of maize plantse0
- Direction
- more favourablee0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“More intensive tillage varijants hade a more favourable influence on the height of maize plants, ear yield and grain yield”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
Claim · model-written summary
More intensive tillage favored maize ear yield over reduced tillage.
- Treatment
- More intensive tillage varijantse0
- Outcome
- ear yielde0
- Direction
- more favourablee0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“More intensive tillage varijants hade a more favourable influence on the height of maize plants, ear yield and grain yield”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
Claim · model-written summary
More intensive tillage favored maize grain yield over reduced tillage.
- Treatment
- More intensive tillage varijantse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- more favourablee0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“More intensive tillage varijants hade a more favourable influence on the height of maize plants, ear yield and grain yield”
t0“corn (Zea mays L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
Claim · model-written summary
The most intensive tillage gave the greatest soybean height.
- Taxon
- soybean (Glicine max L.)
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- most intesive tillage methode0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- biggeste0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most intesive tillage method indicated the biggest plant height and the biggest number of pods per plant, as well as the highest number of seeds within a pod (variant E)”
t0“soybean (Glicine max L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
Claim · model-written summary
The most intensive tillage gave the greatest number of soybean pods per plant.
- Taxon
- soybean (Glicine max L.)Glycine maxt0
- Treatment
- most intesive tillage methode0
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante0
- Direction
- biggeste0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most intesive tillage method indicated the biggest plant height and the biggest number of pods per plant, as well as the highest number of seeds within a pod (variant E)”
t0“soybean (Glicine max L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
Claim · model-written summary
The most intensive tillage gave the highest soybean seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- soybean (Glicine max L.)Glycine maxt0
- Treatment
- most intesive tillage methode0
- Outcome
- number of seeds within a pode0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- reduced tillage methodse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most intesive tillage method indicated the biggest plant height and the biggest number of pods per plant, as well as the highest number of seeds within a pod (variant E)”
t0“soybean (Glicine max L.)”
e1“reduced tillage methods”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
80 papers more in this group
See all 84 papers →tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.