Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Annual wheat yield increases in dry years were 11.0-33.8%.

A claim from Effects of Ridge and Furrow Planting Patterns on Crop Yield and Grain Quality in Dryland Maize–Wheat Double Cropping System · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual wheat yield increases in dry years were 11.0-33.8%.

Treatment
all four ridge and furrow planting patternse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.0-33.8%e0
Qualifier
annually in dry yearse0
Comparator
CFe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to CF, all four ridge and furrow planting patterns significantly enhanced crop yield in dry and normal years, and the effects varied depending on crop species, with increases of 45.3-97.8% for wheat and 11.0-33.8% increases annually in dry years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1229

Title

Effects of Ridge and Furrow Planting Patterns on Crop Yield and Grain Quality in Dryland Maize–Wheat Double Cropping System

Qihui Zhou; Ming Huang; Chuan Hu; et al. Plants 2025. doi:10.3390/plants14193030

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-3d883e3a88a840d1a97f16d9db756f04aa84ea5a2b29d14bc5bb861580eb3193 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.