Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 2:1 sorghum–cowpea ratio produced significantly higher dry fodder yield of 103.30 q ha-1.

A claim from Studies on Green Fodder Yield, Quality and Economics of Cereal Forage Sown alone and Intercrop with Cowpea · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2:1 sorghum–cowpea ratio produced significantly higher dry fodder yield of 103.30 q ha-1.

Taxon
sorghum and cowpeaVigna unguiculataSorghume0
Treatment
2:1 row ratio intercropping of sorghum and cowpeae0
Outcome
dry fodder yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
103.30 q ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the green fodder and dry fodder yield as 491.0 and 103.30 q ha-1 respectively were found significantly higher with 2:1 row ratio intercropping of sorghum and cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–789

Title

Studies on Green Fodder Yield, Quality and Economics of Cereal Forage Sown alone and Intercrop with Cowpea

Ramanand Chaudhary; Sanjeev Kumar Gupta; Anshuman Kohli; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.911.224

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-3e3ca356ebca6068bfc3dbda3804f497c149a07e11f0ec58b17f031043139711 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Sorghum · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

49 papers: 40 positive, 9 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.