Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Since 1983, LW rotations gave lower mean grain protein and total N uptake than CW.

A claim from Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Since 1983, LW rotations gave lower mean grain protein and total N uptake than CW.

Treatment
LW rotationse5
Outcome
mean grain protein and total N uptakee5
Direction
lowere5
Qualifier
Since 1983e5
Comparator
CWe5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97
e5

“Since 1983, LW rotations consistently produced higher mean grain yields than CW, but mean grain protein and total N uptake were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1142

Title

Long term effects of rotation, tillage and stubble management on wheat production in southern NSW

DP Heenan; AC Taylor; BR Cullis; et al. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1994. doi:10.1071/ar9940093

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-3e8a7cc490c3373b6b494d1e0f700ea29103346cf7d5447fe2db263d4ae0bcb5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

rotation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.