Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low-rate glyphosate use built up common lambsquarters.

A claim from Weed Population Dynamics after Six Years under Glyphosate‐ and Conventional Herbicide‐based Weed Control Strategies · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-rate glyphosate use built up common lambsquarters.

Treatment
glyphosate is applied at 0.4 kg ae ha −1 twice each yeare0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
buildup of common lambsquarterse0
Direction
buildupe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the buildup of common lambsquarters and wild buckwheat that occurs when glyphosate is applied at 0.4 kg ae ha −1 twice each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105
t0

“glyphosate‐resistant corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–45

Title

Weed Population Dynamics after Six Years under Glyphosate‐ and Conventional Herbicide‐based Weed Control Strategies

Philip Westra; Robert G. Wilson; Stephen D. Miller; et al. Crop Science 2008. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0490

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-3eaedfdcf75ae5fad11d03aed1ca019e0f7a22df58f4018c2eb98e54c07a7ed9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · Chenopodium album · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.