Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Si supply significantly increased leaf area compared with no-feed Si plants, peaking at 0.05 g/kg

A claim from Effect of silicon supply on alfalfa growth · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Si supply significantly increased leaf area compared with no-feed Si plants, peaking at 0.05 g/kg

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Si supplye2
Outcome
leaf areae2
Direction
largere2
Qualifier
peaked in the 0.05 g/kg treatmentse2
Comparator
no-feed Si plantse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of silicon supply on alfalfa growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42
e2

“Plants with Si supply had a significantly larger leaf area than no-feed Si plants, and leaf area peaked in the 0.05 g/kg treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1235

Title

Effect of silicon supply on alfalfa growth

Guo Hua ZHENG Acta Ecologica Sinica 2006

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-3f3f37240264cbbf70c9cc9da2502c1aa31f6229c5163606af9c59655c85e7a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.