Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Supplementary silicon significantly increased alfalfa biomass at 50% or 65% of field water capacity

A claim from Effects of Supplementary Silicon on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Contents in the Shoots of Medicago sativa Plants and in the Soil Under Different Soil Moisture Conditions · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary silicon significantly increased alfalfa biomass at 50% or 65% of field water capacity

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
supplementary silicone1
Outcome
biomass of alfalfa plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
soil moisture was 50% or 65% of field water capacitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but significantly increased the biomass of alfalfa plants when the soil moisture was 50% or 65% of field water capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–511
e1

“supplementary silicon had no effect on the biomass of alfalfa plants when the soil moisture was 35% or 80% of field water capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–391
t0

“Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112

Title

Effects of Supplementary Silicon on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Contents in the Shoots of Medicago sativa Plants and in the Soil Under Different Soil Moisture Conditions

Huixia Liu Chinese Journal of Appplied Environmental Biology 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e5d8b06573e7a14422e7e45d01630645292d70acc5690eb12fbc5ee7917ddd67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.